|
"Mein
Kampf is my bible"- John Tyndall,
founder of The BNP.
The BNP was founded
as an anti non-white European immigration party by a self
confessed neo-Nazi, who believed in implementing Hitler's
"Final Solution"
"with
the numbers of murderous asocials and perverts on the increase,
as a result of our sick society, there will be an unanswerable
case when the day for the great clean up comes, to implement
the final solution against these sub-human elements by means
of the gas chambers" - John
Tyndall, founder and former leader of The BNP
Of course, no
decent person wants to have murderous people and "perverts"
in society, but the problem here, apart from debate about
capital punishment and the idea of using gas chambers as a
means of execution, is in the definition. In this case the
word "Perverts" includes homosexuals. John Tyndall
believed in sending people to the gas chamber for being gay.
--------------------
"Racial
laws will be enacted forbidding marriage between Britons and
non-Aryans: medical measures will be taken to prevent procreation
on the part of all those who have hereditary defects either
racial, mental or physical." - John Tyndall
To date, the
basic fundamental aims and beliefs of the BNP have not
changed, they remain the same, the people running the
party, those who make the policies, have just found ways of
making them sound more acceptable.
--------------------
Repatriation
"the
introduction of a system of voluntary resettlement whereby
those immigrants and their descendants who are legally here
are afforded the opportunity to return to their lands of ethnic
origin assisted by a generous financial incentives both for
individuals and for the countries in question." - BNP
General Election Manifesto 2005
What
is the purpose of "voluntary repatriation" if no-one
wants to volunteer to be repatriated?
How could the
BNP get people whose families have been here for many years,
who are settled down, who are running businesses and helping
to keep many of our essential industries afloat, to want to
leave?
For example:
There are immigrants and the children of immigrants living
in Leicester, working for one of our biggest British owned
companies, who are earning as much as £6000 commission
per month on top of a £17,000+ salary, working and living
along side the "indigenous" population who are earning
the same. What kind of financial incentive would make those
people want to move to a country that is not their home, that
many of them have never even been to, and where they would
probably have to live in relative poverty?
This is where
the other actions of the BNP come into play.
What the BNP
are doing is cultivating hatred and conflict between groups,
the BNP know this hatred and conflict exists already so they
can't be blamed for starting it.
They are doing
this by means of the selective reporting of crimes by non-whites
(in evidence throughout internet forums and BNP propaganda),
getting people used to the idea that immigrants and the children
of immigrants are likely to be criminals and of course should
be removed from the country, and by the spreading of misleading
statistics (as with the claim about the percentage of immigrants
in 2001 census being wrong when in fact a simple bit of analysis
proved the percentage to be correct) plus the spreading of
misinformation.
The point of
this cultivation of hatred is quite simple, divide & conquer.
Help create a difficult country for everyone to live in, the
immigrant population will eventually feel like moving out
and of course the "indigenous" population can't
be repatriated. Basically, the BNP are trying to create the
conditions where immigrants will want to leave, therefore
the BNP could not be accused of forcing them to leave.
Griffin and his
associates have also actively sought the support of some of
the nastiest regimes on the planet, they have even been funded
by Colonel Gaddaffi. This is because although they are culturally
different they shared the same goals, racial separation and
the oppression of the Jewish people.
--------------------
"Common
interest must be turned into practical cooperation. Those
involved must work to nail the media lies which are used by
our enemies to try and divide us and make us afraid to be
seen standing side by side with Third Way nations such as
Libya and Iran" - Nick Griffin
--------------------
Asylum
The other main
policy which works in conjunction with this is the one about
observing international laws and only taking asylum seekers
and other immigrants from neighboring countries.
"3.
Under present circumstances we would abide by our obligations
under the 1951 United Nations Convention on Refugees. We recognise
the existence of legitimate international refugees from persecution
and war, but point to the fact that international law provides
that such persons must be given – and must seek –
refuge in the nearest safe country. So, unless a flood of
refugees from a civil war in France or Denmark shows up on
our shores, these refugees are simply not Britain's responsibility
and have no right to refuge here." - BNP general election
manifesto 2005
The majority
of people in our neighbouring countries happen to be white
and European. Therefore if we only take immigrants from our
neighbouring countries or places like Australia, North America
and Canada, the majority of immigrants coming into the country
will be white and European. However, some of those immigrants
could still be non-white Europeans because there are still
non-white Europeans living as citizens of our neighbouring
countries.
--------------------
Is
The BNP really an anti-immigration party?
"The
horrifying future that awaits Britain as a result of the follies
of Third World immigration can only be averted if we adopt
two very firm policies: 1) Future immigration of non-whites
must be stopped; 2) Non-whites already here must be repatriated
or otherwise resettled overseas and Britain made once again
a white country". -
BNP General Election Manifesto 1997
After its poor
results in the 1997 General Election, The BNP has cleverly
changed its policies of forced repatriation to "voluntary
repatriation". It is my opinion that this has been changed
in order to make the BNP more appealing to the electorate,
but the policy, combined with a few others, still amount to
the same thing.
"A
BNP government would accept no further immigration from any
of the parts of the world which present the prospect of an
almost limitless flow of immigration: Africa, Asia, China,
Eastern and South Eastern Europe, the Middle East and South
America would all be placed on an immediate ‘stop' list."
- BNP
General Election Manifesto 2005
This disproves
the idea that the BNP is an anti-immigration party and indicates
that it The BNP would actually still allow most immigrants
into the country so long as they are white and not from countries
with governments which are to the left of the political compass.
The reality of
the situation is that the majority of immigrants in the UK
originate from the Republic of Ireland, yet Ireland is NOT
on The BNP 'stop list'. Other countries which are in the top
ten countries of origin for UK immigrants include Germany,
USA, Australia and New Zealand, none of which are included
in the 'stop list' either.
Which is where
the alliance comes in.
The alliance
exists, it has done for a long time. It includes far-right
groups all over Europe and also groups such as the KKK.
The evidence for this alliance is in the fact that members
of those groups regularly meet with each other and talk at
each others events. Both David Duke and Jean Marie LePen are
friends of Nick Griffin's (Nick being the main policy maker
for The BNP) and they have spent plenty of time together.
Their statements show they share the same beliefs, although
they may slightly differ about how to implement them.
What this means
is that these groups need to work together in order to achieve
their goal.
The BNP campaigns
to repatriate immigrants, cultivates hatred and conflict in
Britain (as witnessed in this forum) and advocates only taking
in people from neighbouring countries. So do the friends of
the BNP in our neighbouring countries.
So what this
leads me to believe the BNP want is:
Life becomes
more and more difficult for non-white European people living
in Europe, their numbers (which already make up a small percentage
of the population) start to dwindle further. The policy of
only taking immigrants from neighbouring countries is implemented
under the cover of observing international law, which means
that migration throughout Europe becomes even more exclusively
white.
What The BNP
and their friends get is the goal they've always been after
but without being seen to be doing anything illegal or morally
wrong. It's clever stuff and those people who have had their
prejudices and fears cultivated by the propaganda of the BNP,
are just pawns in their game.
Holocaust
denial
--------------------
"Back
in the 1960s the Jews quietly shifted the alleged sites of
the mass gassings from the no longer believable German camps
such as Dachau and Belsen to the sites in Communist Poland
such as Auschwitz and Treblinka. Now that the very idea of
Zyklon-B extermination has been exposed as unscientific
nonsense, they are once and again rewriting bogus history,
playing down gas chambers and talking instead of ‘hundreds
of hitherto unknown sites in the East where more than a million
Jews were exterminated by shooting" - Nick
Griffin, Chairman of The BNP.
"the
controllers of Hollywood, almost entirely Jewish" - Nick
Griffin
"Some
‘anti-Semitism’ may be provoked by the actions of
certain Jews themselves and thereby have a rational basis"
- Nick Griffin
--------------------
In 1995 Nick
Griffin stated that it should be a BNP priority to teach holocaust
denial to our school children. He has also expressed that
David Irving didn't go far enough.
Nick
Griffin has never retracted any of his statements, in fact
he has said his views haven't changed.
The defense that
Nick Griffin is just one man, isn't the BNP and that his beliefs
are necessarily the basic beliefs of the BNP doesn't hold
any ground because the BNP isn't a democratic organisation,
Nick Griffin makes and upholds the policies, he doesn't care
much for democracy, as is demonstrated by this statement:
"When
the crunch comes, power is the product of force and will,
not of rational debate." - Nick Griffin
--------------------
|
